Thursday, February 14, 2013

1302.2938 (L. Fatibene et al.)

Mathematical Equivalence vs. Physical Equivalence between Extended
Theories of Gravitations
   [PDF]

L. Fatibene, M. Francaviglia
We shall show that although Palatini f(R)-theories are equivalent to Brans-Dicke theories, still the first pass the Mercury precession of perihelia test, while the second do not. We argue that the two models are not physically equivalent due to a different assumptions about free fall. We shall also go through perihelia test without fixing a conformal gauge (clocks or rulers) in order to highlight what can be measured in a conformal invariant way and what cannot. We shall argue that the conformal gauge is broken by choosing a definition of clock, rulers or, equivalently, of masses.
View original: http://arxiv.org/abs/1302.2938

No comments:

Post a Comment