Monday, June 25, 2012

1206.5056 (Brett Bochner)

Cosmic Acceleration from Causal Backreaction with Recursive
Nonlinearities
   [PDF]

Brett Bochner
We revisit the causal backreaction paradigm, in which the need for Dark Energy is eliminated via the generation of an apparent cosmic acceleration from the causal flow of inhomogeneity information coming in towards each observer from distant structure-forming regions. This second-generation formalism incorporates "recursive nonlinearities": the process by which already-established metric perturbations will then act to slow down all future flows of inhomogeneity information. Here, the long-range effects of causal backreaction are now damped, weakening its impact for models that were previously best-fit cosmologies. Nevertheless, we find that causal backreaction can be recovered as a replacement for Dark Energy via the adoption of larger values for the dimensionless `strength' of the clustering evolution functions being modeled -- a change justified by the hierarchical nature of clustering and virialization in the universe, occurring on multiple cosmic length scales simultaneously. With this, and with one new model parameter representing the slowdown of clustering due to astrophysical feedback processes, an alternative cosmic concordance can once again be achieved for a matter-only universe in which the apparent acceleration is generated entirely by causal backreaction effects. One drawback is a new degeneracy which broadens our predicted range for the observed jerk parameter $j_{0}^{\mathrm{Obs}}$, thus removing what had appeared to be a clear signature for distinguishing causal backreaction from Cosmological Constant $\Lambda$CDM. As for the long-term fate of the universe, incorporating recursive nonlinearities appears to make the possibility of an `eternal' acceleration due to causal backreaction far less likely; though this does not take into account gravitational nonlinearities or the large-scale breakdown of cosmological isotropy, effects not easily modeled within this formalism.
View original: http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.5056

No comments:

Post a Comment